It is also less time consuming. But be that as it may, we are not trying to sit in judgement. Governments are boats of passages, Ministers are even more so. Why I am saying this is, these are decisions to be taken by State Governments. When they come up with proposals, we respond appropriately and all their proposals are appraised technically and economically at the Planning Commission's level. Some concerns have been raised by Shri Tripathy about security. Let me tell him, through you, Sir, that security measures were not neglected. Security has been entrusted to the Central Industrial Security Force and CCTV has been installed. So far, it has been our good lunch that the record of Delhi Metro, from the view point of security, has been unrivalled. Sir, Shri Sudhakar Reddy has referred to the problem of Hyderabad Metro. I do not want to sit in judgement over what happened in Hyderabad Metro. But I would like to clarify I had clarified earlier too that this was an initiative of the State Government. The Government of India would have had a say if we needed to provide financial assistance. Since the Government of Andhra Pradesh did not seek financial assistance, we had no say in the matter. As far as his demand that we implement the same system in Hyderabad as we have done in Delhi is concerned, I can only say that it is for the State Government to make the proposal. I, on my own, will not be able to say anything as a Minister of the Central Government. The State Government has given the project to Maytas and Maytas company has collapsed, so the whole project has collapsed. We want the Government of India to take initiative to start it again. I agree, but I would not like to leave any questions unanswered. Basically, such matters.
